Current:Home > InvestA Japan court says North Korea is responsible for the abuses of people lured there by false promises -Blueprint Money Mastery
A Japan court says North Korea is responsible for the abuses of people lured there by false promises
View
Date:2025-04-18 16:03:17
TOKYO (AP) — A Japanese high court on Monday said the North Korean government was responsible for the human rights abuses of plaintiffs who said they were lured to the North by Pyongyang’s false promise of living in “paradise on Earth,” a decision praised as a victory by survivors and their supporters.
“The ruling showed that a Japanese court can rule on North Korea’s human rights violations, one that could have a significant impact,” said a lawyer for the plaintiffs, Kenji Fukuda.
The four plaintiffs, including ethnic Koreans and Japanese, moved to North Korea with thousands of others under a 1959-1984 program in which the North promised free health care, education, jobs and other benefits. But they said none of that was available and they were mostly assigned manual work at mines, forests or farms and forced to live in harsh conditions.
Originally, five plaintiffs filed a lawsuit in 2018 with the Tokyo District Court seeking 100 million yen ($900,000) each in compensation for “illegal solicitation and detainment.”
The district court acknowledged in a March 2022 ruling that the plaintiffs had moved to North Korea because of false information provided by the North and a pro-North Korean organization in Japan, Chongryon. But the ruling said the statute of limitations had expired and that Japanese courts do not have jurisdiction because the plaintiffs’ suffering took place outside Japan.
Four plaintiffs appealed the decision, arguing that Japan has jurisdiction because their ordeal began when they boarded ships in a Japanese port.
On Monday, the Tokyo High Court ruled that the Japanese court had jurisdiction over the case and found that the North Korean government violated the rights of the plaintiffs by forcing them to live under miserable, harsh conditions that were completely different from the information provided before their trip.
The North infringed on the plaintiffs’ freedom to choose a place to live, and they were virtually “robbed of their lives” as a result, the court said.
The case now returns to the Tokyo District Court, where it will review the extent of damages the North Korean government must pay to the plaintiffs, their lawyers said.
North Korea, however, has never responded to the lawsuit and likely will not pay damages.
One plaintiff, Eiko Kawasaki, now 81, was 17 when she boarded a ship to North Korea in 1960 and was stuck there until she was able to flee back to Japan in 2003, leaving behind her grown children.
Kawasaki wiped her tears and raised her fists in victory outside the court. She later told reporters that Monday’s ruling is a full victory for the victims.
Kawasaki said she risked her life to flee North Korea to let the world know about the North Korean repatriation program and that “I’m so glad that I could return to Japan alive and see the ruling today,” NHK television reported.
About half a million ethnic Koreans currently live in Japan and face discrimination in school, at work and in their daily lives. Many are descendants of Koreans who came to Japan, many forcibly, to work in mines and factories during Japan’s colonization of the Korean Peninsula — a past that still strains relations between Japan and the Koreas.
In 1959, North Korea began a resettlement program to bring overseas Koreans to the North to make up for workers killed during the Korean War. The Japanese government, viewing ethnic Koreans as outsiders, welcomed the program and helped arrange for people to travel to North Korea. About 93,000 ethnic Korean residents of Japan and their family members moved to the North.
About 150 have made it back to Japan, according to a group supporting defectors from North Korea.
veryGood! (888)
Related
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- Here’s why Harvey Weinstein’s New York rape conviction was tossed and what happens next
- Chicago Bears select QB Caleb Williams with No. 1 pick in 2024 NFL draft
- Southwest says it's pulling out of 4 airports. Here's where.
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- Judge reject’s Trump’s bid for a new trial in $83.3 million E. Jean Carroll defamation case
- Judge denies request for Bob Baffert-trained Muth to run in 2024 Kentucky Derby
- US abortion battle rages on with moves to repeal Arizona ban and a Supreme Court case
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- Antiwar protesters’ calls for divestment at universities put spotlight on how endowments are managed
Ranking
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Jack Wagoner, attorney who challenged Arkansas’ same-sex marriage ban, dies
- Nick and Aaron Carter doc announced by 'Quiet on Set' network: See the trailer
- Kelly Ripa and Mark Consuelos Share Why Working Together Has Changed Their Romance
- Selena Gomez's "Weird Uncles" Steve Martin and Martin Short React to Her Engagement
- School lunches are changing: USDA updates rules to limit added sugars for the first time
- Christine Quinn Accuses Ex of Planting Recording Devices and a Security Guard at Home in Emergency Filing
- Gigi Hadid and Bradley Cooper's Romance Is Limitless in Cute Photo From Her Family Birthday Dinner
Recommendation
New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
Average long-term US mortgage rate climbs for fourth straight week to highest level since November
Harvey Weinstein's 2020 rape conviction overturned by New York appeals court: Live updates
Prosecutors want a reversal after a Texas woman’s voter fraud conviction was overturned
Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
Massive fire seen as Ukraine hits Russian oil depots with a drone strike
Sophia Bush Details “Heartbreak” of Her Fertility Journey
Selena Gomez Addresses Rumors She's Selling Rare Beauty