Current:Home > reviewsJudge overturns $4.7 billion jury award to NFL Sunday Ticket subscribers -Blueprint Money Mastery
Judge overturns $4.7 billion jury award to NFL Sunday Ticket subscribers
View
Date:2025-04-13 16:07:02
A federal judge on Thursday overturned the $4.7 billion jury award in the class action suit for subscribers of the NFL Sunday Ticket programming package.
U.S. District Judge Philip Gutierrez granted the National Football League's request to toss out the award. The judge said the jury did not follow his instructions and created an "overcharge," he wrote in his order.
Gutierrez also said that models presented during the trial about what a media landscape (and subscription fees) would look like without NFL Sunday Ticket were faulty and "not the product of sound economic methodology," he wrote in the order.
As a result, the damages were more "guesswork or speculation" than figures based on "evidence and reasonable inferences," Gutierrez wrote.
New sports streaming service:Venu Sports sets price at $42.99/month: What you can (and can't) get with it
NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.
What were the jury instructions?
Jurors were instructed to calculate damages based on "the difference between the prices Plaintiffs actually paid for Sunday Ticket and the prices Plaintiffs would have paid had there been no agreement to restrict output.”
DirecTV offered Sunday Ticket from 1994 to 2022, with the cost for residential subscribers typically running between $300 and $400. Last year, Google began offering the programming package via YouTube. This year, NFL Sunday Ticket costs $349 to $449.
On June 27, a federal jury in California awarded NFL Sunday Ticket subscribers more than $4.7 billion in damages and nearly $97 million to bars, restaurants, and other businesses with commercial subscriptions to the package.
The plaintiff's attorneys argued that the NFL, CBS, Fox and DirecTV created a "single, monopolized product" in packaging out-of-market NFL games in the Sunday Ticket package. Because the Sunday Ticket was the only way to get those NFL games, consumers paid inflated prices over the years, the plaintiffs alleged.
The NFL denied any wrongdoing and defended the programming package's distribution model as a premium product.
“We are grateful for today’s ruling in the Sunday Ticket class action lawsuit," the NFL said in a statement sent to USA TODAY. "We believe that the NFL's media distribution model provides our fans with an array of options to follow the game they love, including local broadcasts of every single game on free over-the-air television. We thank Judge Gutierrez for his time and attention to this case and look forward to an exciting 2024 NFL season.”
So what happens now?
The plaintiffs likely could appeal the latest ruling in the case, which began in 2015 when two businesses and two individual subscribers sued on behalf of NFL Sunday Ticket subscribers from 2011.
An estimated 2.4 million residential subscribers and 48,000 businesses bought the NFL Sunday Ticket package from June 17, 2011, to Feb. 7, 2023. In a January 2024 filing, plaintiffs said they were entitled to damages of up to $7.01 billion.
The judge's order stems from the NFL's argument in court on Wednesday that the jury's award should be overturned.
"There's no doubt about what they did," Gutierrez said Wednesday ahead of his ruling, according to Courthouse News. "They didn't follow the instructions."
The subscribers' attorney, Mark Seltzer, told Gutierrez on Wednesday that the jurors should be able to negotiate a fair damages award provided it falls within an evidence-supported range, Courthouse News reported.
Contributing: Michael Middlehurst-Schwartz, Lorenzo Reyes and Brent Schrotenboer.
Follow Mike Snider on X and Threads: @mikesnider & mikegsnider.
What's everyone talking about? Sign up for our trending newsletter to get the latest news of the day
veryGood! (963)
Related
- Who's hosting 'Saturday Night Live' tonight? Musical guest, how to watch Dec. 14 episode
- Fantasy football buy low, sell high: 10 trade targets for Week 10
- NFL trade deadline live updates: Latest news, rumors, analysis ahead of Tuesday's cutoff
- A look at the weather expected in battleground states on Election Day
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- Tornado threats remain in Oklahoma after 11 injured, homes damaged in weekend storms
- Heavy rain leads to flash flooding, water rescues in southern Missouri
- The final day of voting in the US is here, after tens of millions have already cast their ballots
- Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
- Rudy Giuliani cleared out his apartment weeks before court deadline to turn over assets, lawyers say
Ranking
- Kylie Jenner Shows Off Sweet Notes From Nieces Dream Kardashian & Chicago West
- Can cats have chocolate? How dangerous the sweet treat is for your pet
- How to find lost or forgotten pensions, 401(k)s, and retirement money
- Why the NBA Doesn't Have Basketball Games on Election Day
- Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
- A former Six Flags park is finally being demolished after Hurricane Katrina’s devastation
- Connor McDavid ankle injury update: Where does Edmonton Oilers star stand in his recovery?
- Baron Browning trade grades: Who won deal between Cardinals, Broncos?
Recommendation
2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
Storm in the Caribbean is on a track to likely hit Cuba as a hurricane
When is the NFL trade deadline? Date, time, top trade candidates and deals done so far
Johnny Depp’s Lawyer Camille Vasquez Reveals Why She “Would Never” Date Him Despite Romance Rumors
Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
Connor McDavid ankle injury update: Where does Edmonton Oilers star stand in his recovery?
IRS raises 401(k) contribution limits, adds super catch-up for 60-63 year olds in 2025
Trump wants the presidential winner to be declared on election night. That’s highly unlikely