Current:Home > reviewsExxon Relents, Wipes Oil Sands Reserves From Its Books -Blueprint Money Mastery
Exxon Relents, Wipes Oil Sands Reserves From Its Books
Fastexy View
Date:2025-04-06 16:10:52
ExxonMobil announced Wednesday that it had wiped off its books all 3.5 billion barrels of tar sands oil reserves at one of its projects in Canada. Because of recent low oil prices, the company said none of those reserves can be considered economical according to the accounting rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The accounting change at its Kearl project, a momentous if expected development, represented a turnaround for the company, which has long resisted calls to revise its reserves estimates. Over the past decade, Exxon had steadily increased its holdings in Canada’s tar sands to become a leading producer there.
Exxon also removed from its books 800 million barrels of oil-equivalent reserves in North America, though the reductions were offset by the addition of 1 billion barrels of oil and gas elsewhere.
Exxon said in October that low prices would likely force it to “de-book” up to 4.6 billion barrels of reserves in its end-of-year accounting. Securities and Exchange Commission rules allow oil companies to count reserves only if they are profitable based on average prices over the previous year.
But while the accounting change removes billions of dollars worth of tar sands investments from the company’s annual report, and is watched closely by investors, it will not directly affect operations. Exxon plans to continue operating its Kearl project, and said it will add back the reserves if oil prices rise or costs drop. After the reduction, the company now reports holding 1.3 billion barrels of tar sands reserves.
Exxon will hold an analyst meeting on March 1.
Earlier this week, ConocoPhillips said it had reduced its oil sands reserves by more than 1 billion barrels, bringing its total to 1.2 billion for 2016. These moves had been expected, as low oil prices have placed a heavy burden on tar sands projects, which are among the most expensive and polluting sources of oil.
veryGood! (5857)
Related
- South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
- Can China save its economy - and ours?
- See the Royal Family at King Charles III's Trooping the Colour Celebration
- Do Leaked Climate Reports Help or Hurt Public Understanding of Global Warming?
- McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
- Please Stand Up and See Eminem's Complete Family Tree
- Jobs vs prices: the Fed's dueling mandates
- A 20-year-old soldier from Boston went missing in action during World War II. 8 decades later, his remains have been identified.
- Jorge Ramos reveals his final day with 'Noticiero Univision': 'It's been quite a ride'
- Mary Nichols Was the Early Favorite to Run Biden’s EPA, Before She Became a ‘Casualty’
Ranking
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- Big Rigged (Classic)
- Planes Sampling Air Above the Amazon Find the Rainforest is Releasing More Carbon Than it Stores
- New York City nurses end strike after reaching a tentative agreement
- Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
- Tom Brady Shares His and Ex Gisele Bundchen's Parenting Game Plan
- The U.S. economy ended 2022 on a high note. This year is looking different
- Charles Manson follower Leslie Van Houten released from prison after serving 53 years for 2 murders
Recommendation
Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
Maryland, Virginia Lawmakers Spearhead Drive to Make the Chesapeake Bay a National Recreation Area
Senators slam Ticketmaster over bungling of Taylor Swift tickets, question breakup
Read Jennifer Garner's Rare Public Shout-Out to Ex Ben Affleck
EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
Surgeon shot to death in suburban Memphis clinic
How Dying Forests and a Swedish Teenager Helped Revive Germany’s Clean Energy Revolution
A big bank's big mistake, explained