Current:Home > FinanceKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -Blueprint Money Mastery
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-13 09:00:04
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (823)
Related
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- West Point time capsule mystery takes a twist: There was something in there after all
- Justin Jefferson selected top wide receiver by panel of AP Pro Football Writers
- Miley Cyrus Reveals the Real Story Behind Her Controversial 2008 Vanity Fair Cover
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- Trump launched an ambitious effort to end HIV. House Republicans want to defund it.
- Ugandan man, 20, faces possible death penalty under draconian anti-gay law
- Andrew Lester in court, charged with shooting Black teen Ralph Yarl for ringing doorbell
- Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
- Millions of workers earning less than $55,000 could get overtime pay under Biden proposal
Ranking
- Small twin
- Dakota Johnson's Ditches Her Signature Brunette Hair for a Blonde Bob in New Movie
- Tampa Bay area gets serious flooding but again dodges a direct hit from a major hurricane.
- Where did Idalia make landfall? What to know about Florida's Nature Coast and Big Bend
- $73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
- Japan’s Sogo & Seibu department stores are being sold to a US fund as 900 workers go on strike
- Taylor Russell Shares Her Outlook on Relationships Amid Harry Styles Romance Rumors
- Fake 'sober homes' targeting Native Americans scam millions from taxpayers
Recommendation
Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
Manchin and his daughter pitching donors on a centrist political group, source says
Summer School 8: Graduation and the Guppy Tank
Most-Shopped Celeb-Recommended Items This Month: Alix Earle, Kyle Richards, Paige DeSorbo, and More
Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
Step Inside the Stunning California Abode Alex Cooper and Fiancé Matt Kaplan Call Home
Millions of additional salaried workers could get overtime pay under Biden proposal
Judge rules for Georgia election workers in defamation suit against Rudy Giuliani over 2020 election falsehoods